"It does not require a majority to prevail, 
but rather an irate, tireless minority keen to set brush fires in people's minds."
 --Samuel Adams - Leader in our Fight for Independence

Legal Actions

Montanans For Multiple Use is going to court to defend your private property rights and your right to use and enjoy our public lands.   

We are a co-plaintiff on a lawsuit initiated by the Wyoming Association of Conservation Districts against the klinton-Gore Clean Water Action Plan (CWAP)AND WE WON!!  

We have also sued in Federal District Court in Montana because the Flathead NF failed to respond to a FOIA request from MFMU as they are required to do by law.  WE WON!! that lawsuit and have received a small settlement.   Learn more about this lawsuit.

Our most recent lawsuit has been filed in Federal District Court in Washington, D.C..  This  lawsuit is a major undertaking, which, if successful will have a considerable national impact on how the USFS manages our forests.   On May 4, 2004 we asked the court for an injunction to stop the Flathead Forest from enforcing or implementing all of the amendments that have been enacted since 1994.  The judge refused to grant an injunction but he has denied the request of environmental groups to move the case to Montana.   Judge Roberts took no action on this case for two years and the case is now in the court of Judge Hogan.  He held an oral hearing in March.  AT LAST SOME ACTION!!!.  Read President Hodgebooms latest update on this lawsuit >HERE<

MFMU has joined the other litigants in the Badger Two Medicine lawsuit over closure of motorized access.  

Montanans For Multiple Use has a legal action fund to cover the expenses of litigation.  We must have your help to be successful.  To donate to our Legal Action Fund go >>HERE<< 

MFMU "forest roads and planning" lawsuit objectives:

1. To stop (with injunction) any more road obliteration.

2. To stop (with injunction) any additional amendments to an expired Forest Plan and force the Flathead to begin revision.  The Flathead plan is now nearly 18 yrs. old.

3. To invalidate any amendments after the plan was 10 years old.

4. To establish a court precedent that it is illegal to revise a Forest Plan through numerous incremental amendments.

6. To establish a court precedent that it is illegal to abdicate management responsibility to the USFWS and Endangered Species Act while ignoring all the Multiple use laws USFS managers are charged with. Timber sales cannot be allowed to go to zero.

7. To set a court precedent that after Forest Plans are over 10 years old the revision process must begin so that a revision is completed by 15 years as required by law.

8. To require the Forest Service to open or restore roads illegally closed or obliterated.

MONTANANS FOR MULTIPLE USE NEWS RELEASE June 10, 2003.

Steve Funke, President 406-257-3200

Fred Hodgeboom, Vice President 406-837-1363

Clarence Taber, Board of Directors 406-892-3722

Tuesday morning, June 10, Montanans For Multiple Use (MFMU) and 13 co-plaintiffs have filed a lawsuit in Washington DC against the US Department of Agriculture, US Forest Service and numerous Federal personnel. The objective of the lawsuit is to stop the incremental shutdown of National Forests to public access and active professional management.

For nearly two decades extremist preservationist groups have abused the no risk litigation rights available to them under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA) and other Federal statutes. Under the provisions of EAJA and other federal laws, non-profit corporations are not responsible for the actual cost to the Government if they file a frivolous suit and lose every claim. If they win one claim, then the Government pays them all the outrageous costs they turn in (e.g. "Friends of the Bitterroot" were paid nearly a quarter million dollars to block 90% of the planned timber salvage on only 10% of the burned area).

The effect of this endless stream of preservationist lawsuits has discouraged the USFS from implementing any significant active forest management. The cumulative effect of the extremist actions have reduced the timber supplies, forced the closure of twenty sawmills in Montana, prevented responsible mining, prevented oil and gas extraction, and prevented meaningful agricultural production and recreation in the National Forests. In Montana, as a result, citizens have endured the reduction of their per capita income to the point where they are nearly last in the Nation. At the same time, they have had to shoulder increasing per capita tax burdens as jobs and state tax revenues decline.

Unfortunately, the USFS does not report the costs and effects of obstructionist appeals and litigation to the public or to Congress. Instead the USFS abdicates their management responsibilities to the US Fish and Wildlife Service, activist extremist environmental groups, and the courts. The USFS has made no real efforts to adhere to their statutory responsibilities for protecting and managing the National Forests and to ensure that National Forests contribute to local economic, social, and ecologic sustainability. The USFS has failed to implement existing Forest Plans, illegally revised Forest Plans by piecemeal amendments and site specific actions, failed to disclose the cumulative effects of actions and inactions, failed to revise the Forest Plan as required by law, failed to monitor and evaluate consequences of past management actions, failed to protect existing forests and watersheds, failed to provide a sustainable flow of timber for local and national economic and social sustainability, and failed to collaborate with local communities and tribes.

The suit seeks an injunction to stop any additional implementation of illegal Forest Plan amendment provisions including amendments that call for obliteration of public roads. The injunction will seek to stop any additional amendments to Forest Plans over 10 years old. The suit will seek restoration of illegally obliterated roads, restoration of healthy fire resistant forest stands through active commercial timber management, and to force the USFS to immediately revise existing Forest Plans over 10 years old, making full public disclosure, as required by the National Forest Management Act.

Co-plaintiffs joining Montanans For Multiple Use in this action represent a wide spectrum of forest user groups, business, political and local governments. Co-plaintiffs are: Northwest Montana Gold Prospectors Association, Leland's Honda, Leland J. Moore, Montanans For Property Rights, Capital Trail Vehicle Association, Flathead Snowmobile Association, North American Wolf Watch, Owens and Hurst Lumber Co., Senator Jerry O'Neil, Representative George Everett, Flathead County, Sanders County, and Flathead Business and Industry Association.

Montanans For Multiple Use expect this lawsuit to set a precedent for all National Forests, forcing them to obey all the laws that govern their actions. In addition MFMU intends for the suit to encourage citizens who are fed up with a plan which lets our forests burn to band together and file lawsuits through multiple use non-profit corporations to counteract the extreme preservationists. Perhaps Congress will finally realize that the Equal Access to Justice Act and The Endangered Species Act must be reformed if Congress intends for the USFS professionals to manage the National Forests instead of the courts.

Submitted by Fred D. Hodgeboom, Vice President, Montanans for Multiple Use.

 

Home ] FOIA Lawsuit ] Forest Roads & Planning Suit ] Clean Water Action Plan ]

This page was last updated on 10/16/09

TOP         Contact Webmaster              SITE MAP

Copyright 1999-2007 by  Montanans For Multiple Use 

DHTML JavaScript Menu By Milonic.com 
Website Design